The charms of Maheshenthe
Prathikaaram, Dileesh Pothan’s 2016 directorial debut, cannot be reduced to
its plot, fresh though this is: the tale of everyman Mahesh Bhavana (Fahadh
Faasil), worried about his father’s advancing age, passed over by the woman he
has long loved in favor of a groom with better prospects, publicly humiliated
in an un-related village brawl, and Mahesh’s vow to forego slippers until he
has avenged his insult, never lost my interest as it wended its way through the
contours of its lead protagonist’s life, and on to a resolution. More importantly, the plot never becomes
farcical, not even that last bit about Mahesh’s vow: in the context of the
film, it seems quite organic, the self-inflicted wound of a modest man at the
end of his tether.
Pothan intuitively grasps that for contemporary Malayalam
cinema to thrive, it must be and mean something other than what Tamil cinema
offers on a larger canvas, avoiding the trap of the “merely” local, an “authentic”
counter to the national hegemony of Bollywood.
Tamil cinema is of course a lot more than that, but far too often over the
last decade or so, even (especially?) in its best films, Tamil cinema has been
content with the fact of representation – and while I (an outsider in some way to
all non-Hindi Indian cinematic traditions) have reveled in it, especially where
the representations are of people and milieus increasingly elided from Hindi
popular cinema (and not only Hindi popular cinema), that says more about the
sort of globalized, plastic sludge that is most of Bollywood, than it does
about the path the so-called “new” Tamil cinema has been on.
Conversely, the most populist cinematic forms (in Tamil,
Telugu, and even in Hindi (for instance, in Salman Khan’s films over the last
decade)) suffer from an inability to re-invigorate masala filmmaking idioms, positing a hyper-masculine “rootedness” (as
another marker of cultural authenticity, even as the paradigm seems exhausted
and stale (although Tamil cinema seems alone in its worthy attempts to
problematize this sort of masala
while re-affirming its central gestures, as shown by the likes of Vikram Vedha; tellingly, however, that
runaway hit featured Madhavan and Vijay Sethupati, and it’s hard to imagine a
Vijay or even, sadly, Surya, in anything like it). Malayalam cinema is itself no stranger to
crude masala cinema, as the
heartbreaking choices of Mammooty and Mohanlal over the last couple of decades
loudly remind us; but I suspect the alternative Hindi cinema has chosen – an urbane,
Malayali version of the sort of middling film that does well in Hindi and is in
self-conscious step with the mood of the urban bourgeoisie, the sort of film
Dulquer Salman risks specializing in – does not offer a viable path
either. I enjoyed the likes of Bangalore Days, Ustad Hotel and Kammatipaadam
quite a bit, but too many of these risk the permanent displacement of
Malayalam cinema in favor of Hindi and Tamil cinema.
So what? Pothan is one of those Malayalam filmmakers who
intuits that at its best, Malayalam popular cinema has been a vehicle for the
universal in the local, and a particular sort of universal at that, firmly on
the side of the humane, the gentle, even, it must be said, of the slow, and
thus the very antithesis of Indian cinematic modernity (both in its rootless
and its self-consciously “artsy” avatars).
Maheshenthe Prathikaaram is a
worthy addition to this tradition, drawing viewers in with a painstakingly
constructed sense of place and character.
Pothan announces his intentions early on when the film opens with an ode
to Idukki (no breeze, we are told, is sweeter than the one that blows here, and
the lush greenery of the backdrop makes that claim plausible), before the
setting gives way to the village lanes, homes and shops where most of the film
unfolds.
That setting is memorable in no small measure due to the combined
efforts of Pothan’s colleagues: Bijibal’s melodious songs are integral to the
ambience of this film, his post-Rahman, post-Harris Jayaraj romantic numbers
unobtrusive and sweet; Shyju Khalid’s camera-work is assured, and he deserves
credit for not letting the film’s visuals lapse into the usual clichés surrounding
God’s Own Country (witness the scene in the forest, late in Maheshenthe Prathikaaram, where Mahesh
and his friend gaze up at a large cotton tree, the delicate white flowers
floating down, furnishing them ideas for an urban photo-shoot a few minutes
later). Finally, the art direction and
costume design, by, respectively, Ajayan Chalissery and Sameera Saneesh, bring
the village to life: no two domestic interiors are alike (anyone who pays such
close attention to metal gates and grates, and wire-backed chairs, is A-OK in
my book), and the outdoor spaces are no less distinct: witness the stairs
leading up from the bus-stop to the photography studios where Mahesh,
Babychetta and Crispin while away their days, with green mountains serving as
backdrop to the little establishments, pretty without the sin of postcard
picturesque – that entire setting (and it plays a crucial role in Mahesh’s and
Jimsy’s love story) stayed with me long after the film was over.
[Added 3/1/18:
[Added 3/1/18:
Fahadh Faasil is excellent in the title role, and one really
has to have seen him in other films (Bangalore
Days, for instance) to appreciate how immersed he is playing the part of a
small-town photographer specializing in weddings and passport shots. In the finest traditions of Malayalam cinema,
Faasil is understated and gentle, and (a rarity these days anywhere) isn’t
afraid to shed tears onscreen (he weeps with great, heaving sobs when his
girlfriend leaves him, and the effect is neither embarrassed nor showy, but
simply moving).]
The supporting cast is uniformly excellent, and so seamless
that it is hard to single anyone out: Mahesh’s neighbor Babychetta (Alencier
Ley Lopez); earnest new kid on the block (and unwitting source of much of the
plot’s trouble) Crispin (Soubin Shahir); Mahesh’s nemesis Jimson (Sujith
Sankar); or his first girlfriend Soumya (Anusree); are simply four of many
memorable characters, testimony to Pothan’s light touch and willingness to let
his characters breathe.
Hard, but not impossible: Anthony Kochi deserves especial
attention for his turn as Mahesh’s mostly silent father, Vincent. Kochi brings memorable gravitas to his role,
a task rendered easier by his arresting looks and screen presence: Kochi
outdoes everyone else in the film in this respect, and you miss him when he’s
not on screen. Mahesh’s second
girl-friend Jimsy (Aparna Balamuri) doesn’t have the best-written part, but
Balamuri rescues the character from mere cliché with her portrayal of a spunky
girl who knows what she wants (her participation in a dancing flash mob, viewed
from afar by the camera and gawkers at their balconies alike, is one of the
film’s high points). Finally, we have a
delightful one scene-cameo featuring an absentee landlord-couple Sara (Unnimiya
Prasad) and her husband Eldho (played by the director himself), to great comic
effect: exasperated married couples have rarely been this much fun.
Maheshenthe
Prathikaaram isn’t perfect: in particular, I was disappointed in the way
writer Syam Pushkaran ended his story, doing some violence to the logic of
Mahesh’s character and ethos. That
violence isn’t just metaphorical, and while the fight that serves as the film’s
penultimate sequence is very well-choreographed (in equipoise between a
naturalistic representation of a scrum, and the sort of stylization necessary
to hold a viewer’s interest in two guys going at each other), the film, and
Mahesh, shouldn’t have ended that way.
It’s a small, sour note for me, in a film remarkably free of rancor,
despite the heartbreak, failure, and humiliation Mahesh suffers along the way: Maheshenthe Prathikaaram recovers that
good cheer in its last scene, despite the fact that several characters are
arrayed around a hospital bed, and the last shot is of Mahesh’s rueful smile. That choice tells you all you need to know
about the director: all might never be well, but there’s hope for Malayalam
cinema, and for us, as long as there’s space in the culture for sensibility
like the one showcased here by Dileesh Pothan.
2 comments:
OH MY GOD! Apologies for my millennium induced shrieking but I have recently been introduced to the world of Malayalam cinema and my mind. is. blown. Seriously, I can't even put the pieces back together. The acting, the cinematography, scripts are all so rooted and breathtakingly original.
I LOVED this film - how beautifully is encapsulates the fragility and loveliness of lives. His other work Thondimuthalum Driksakshiyum deserves multiple accolades and so do films by Lijo Joe Pellisery.
I love that there is so much range though I know you think it might fall into the urban Hindi film way but Ustaad Hotel and Bangalore Days and even OK Kanmani I would say felt way more contemporary and real than any recent Hindi film. And they are there is an endearing sweetness within all the fluff. Heck _ am even engossed by the Mammoothy and Mohahlal ones.
Sorry for the ramblings, but so happy to see your review!
Glad to hear that -- reminds me of my own "discovery" of Tamil and Malayalam cinema back in 2002-2003, and the associated excitement and joy. I hope you are checking out the Mohanlal and Mammoothy films from the 1980s...they are easily available on DVD and the best ones are superb...
Post a Comment